September/October 2007
Volume 35 Number 5
Background: N3HBX 15-meter tower. Inset: ZF1A hurricane damage.
WRTC Coverage
Features
Ergonomic Tools for Contesters
Mentoring Newcomers to Contesting
NCJ Reviews: The Elecraft K3 - First Impressions
We Hear from Former NCJ Editors
160 and 80 Meter Antennas at the N3HBX Contest Station
The Radio Amateur Contester's Code
ZF1A in the 2007 IARU HF World Championship
A Simple SO2R Contest Station ZS-Style
NCJ Profiles
 
Columns
RTTY Contesting
Propagation
DX Contest Activity Announcements
Contesting on a Budget
Contest Calendar
Software for Contesters
Contest Tips, Tricks & Techniques
 

Bonus Content
 
Back Issues
2010
Nov/Dec 2009
Sep/Oct 2009
Jul/Aug 2009
May/Jun 2009
Mar/Apr 2009
Jan/Feb 2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001

Order NCJ CD-ROMWRTC Coverage 1990 - 2006NCJ Subscription Link
NCJ Reviews: The Elecraft K3 - First Impressions
Rick Tavan, N6XI
pdf version (1.25MB)
Elecraft K3At the International DX Convention in Visalia earlier this year, Elecraft, www.elecraft.com, unveiled one of the best-kept secrets in ham radio manufacturing history - its new K3 transceiver! Although the Elecraft faithful for years have opined profusely on the company-sponsored e-mail reflector about hypothetical future products, even suggesting the unsurprising name K3, as far as I can tell, not a word leaked out from the company or from its in-the-know advisors during the radio's three year gestation period.

Those advisors - about a dozen focus group members - include several avid contesters. We made our 'druthers very well known during the requirements specification and design phases, and off and on through the rest of the project. Field input has always been important to Elecraft, and high-performance contesting definitely became a design point of the nascent K3. As the radio approached production release, contesters from the focus group were among the most vocal and vigorous field testers.

This article describes the radio from a contester's perspective and presents my initial impressions from participating in the field test. To meet NCJ's deadline, I had to submit this review before field testing actually ended. The QRP test radio lacked the 100W power amplifier, but it drove an Alpha 87A to 250-600W depending on the band. The test unit also had no sub-receiver or noise blanker. The lack of a noise blanker presented a problem at times, but Elecraft has promised an NB for initial-production radios.

Many software features were in preliminary form or not yet implemented, so this is, of necessity, just a first look. In some cases I refer to promised features in the present tense because Elecraft has committed to include them. Others I explicitly note as futures. Because this is a software-defined radio (SDR), the performance and feature set of production units may vary from what I report. Check back here and elsewhere in the coming months for updated comments and for lab test results on production units.

Releasing the K3 into the Amateur Radio marketplace will not be the end of the story. Elecraft plans a series of new features and improvements over the coming years, and you'll be able to download them to the radio in minutes via the Internet and your PC. There is plenty of unused program memory, so Elecraft will not be limited in the scope of future improvements.

Design

Not at all an upgraded K2, the K3 is an entirely new radio and a new manufacturing concept. Whereas the K2 is an inexpensive, digitally-controlled, analog radio in kit form, the K3 is a mid-priced, factory-built digital radio with some interesting analog stages. While the K2 was born out of the QRP movement and later acquired an add-on 100W amplifier and digital signal processing (DSP), Elecraft is introducing the K3 with a full complement of bells and whistles. Although it is available as a semi-kit - a box of manufactured boards and cabinetry that the purchaser can assemble without need of a soldering iron - the factory-built and factory-aligned boards assure that every radio will have identical performance and reliability expectations. The only tools required are a dummy load, Philips screwdriver and digital multi-meter.

Why did Elecraft deviate so radically from its kit-building roots? Some fo the faithful were disappointed to learn that their soldering irons would sit idle during K3 assembly. Elecraft explains convincingly that its design goals were unachievable without using specialized components available only as surface-mount devices (SMD). The K3 uses enough SMDs (60%) that construction by most amateurs would be impractical.

For the complete version of this article as published in the NCJ, view the pdf version.


Revised December 17, 2007
Copyright © 2000-2010 American Radio Relay League, Inc., All Rights Reserved
Web design by WA7BNM. Address comments to: webmaster